Elon Musk, known for his leadership at Tesla and SpaceX, is now facing significant political scrutiny due to his involvement in the U.S. government’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. While the program was designed to reduce federal spending, concerns have emerged regarding Musk’s influence over policy decisions, particularly given his extensive business ties to China. The controversy has sparked protests, congressional investigations, and growing public unease over his role.

DOGE was launched as a cost-cutting measure within the federal government, granting Musk considerable authority despite his status as a private entrepreneur. In his role as a special government employee, Musk has been given top-level security clearance, yet, unlike others in similar positions, he has not been required to complete a full financial disclosure.

Fears of unchecked power came to the forefront on February 5, 2025, when protesters gathered outside the Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., expressing concerns that Musk could leverage his position to benefit his own businesses. Meanwhile, lawmakers have taken action. Senator Richard Blumenthal has called for Tesla to preserve all records related to DOGE, while Representative Mark Pocan introduced the “ELON MUSK Act,” aimed at preventing government employees from using federal resources to advance their business interests.

The controversy surrounding Musk is further magnified by his deep financial ties to China. Tesla has benefited significantly from the Chinese government’s support, particularly through its Shanghai Gigafactory, which received $1.4 billion in loans from state-backed banks. Unlike many foreign automakers, Tesla operates in China without a local business partner, a privilege that has raised questions among national security experts.

Retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré has warned that China’s government could compel businesses operating within its borders to share intelligence, posing a potential security risk. Even former supporters of Musk have expressed concerns. Political figure Vivek Ramaswamy recently stated that Musk would “jump like a circus monkey when Xi Jinping calls in the hour of need,” highlighting fears that his business interests could conflict with U.S. national security priorities.

Public sentiment regarding Musk’s role in government appears to be shifting. A recent Morning Consult poll revealed that his approval rating in government has declined by 10 points since President Trump’s inauguration, with 46% of respondents viewing his government involvement unfavorably. The issue has also made its way into popular culture, with late-night host Stephen Colbert comparing Musk’s influence to “a chimpanzee with a chainsaw,” reflecting concerns over potential overreach.

Despite mounting criticism from Democratic lawmakers, Republican legislators have largely remained silent, suggesting that Musk’s influence is not solely a partisan issue. However, bipartisan concerns could grow if more evidence emerges linking his business interests to policy decisions in Washington.

Musk’s strong ties to Chinese leadership, including Premier Li Qiang and Vice President Han Zheng, have fueled debates about how these relationships could shape his U.S. government decisions. At the same time, Tesla’s dominance in China is being increasingly challenged. Chinese EV manufacturers like BYD are introducing a wave of competitive new models, while Tesla has not released a high-volume new vehicle since 2020. The Cybertruck, priced around $100,000, has struggled to gain traction in the U.S. and is not yet available in China. If Tesla’s growth in the Chinese market stagnates, Musk may need to reconsider his global business approach—and his role in Washington.

Musk’s involvement in DOGE raises broader ethical and security concerns about private industry leaders holding significant government influence. While his supporters argue that his expertise could enhance government efficiency, critics warn that his extensive business engagements in China present serious conflicts of interest.