Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DOGE0.070.84%SOL19.370.72%BNB287.900.44%USDC1.000.01%AVAX15.990.06%XLM0.080.37%
USDT1.000%XRP0.392.6%BCH121.000.75%DOT5.710.16%ADA0.320.37%LTC85.290.38%
THE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & LifestyleTHE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & Lifestyle

Business

Business

Elon Musk’s X lawsuit against Media Matters will be tried in April.

Listen to the article now

Northrop Grumman and SpaceX Forge Alliance for U.S. Spy

File photo: Twitter’s new X logo as explained by its owner, Elon Musk

Thursday’s US District Court for the Northern District of Texas judgment sets the timetable for a high-profile battle over Media Matters’ study on social media’s anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi content.

In November, X filed a lawsuit against Media Matters for misrepresenting the likelihood of hate speech on the platform.

CNN has asked X about Thursday’s order. Media Matters rejected the comment.

X’s complaint was dubbed “frivolous” and an attempt to suppress Musk’s critics by Media Matters President Angelo Carusone.

The lawsuit alleged that Media Matters’ testing methods did not reflect genuine site users’ experiences and that its reports inflated the likelihood of accessing extremist content.

The judge may rule on summary judgment motions in December, which may settle the dispute before trial.

Musk has experienced comparable problems. In March, a California federal court chastised X and dismissed its lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate. In a 52-page judgment, the judge called that lawsuit punitive rather than safeguarding the platform’s security and legal rights.

“Sometimes it is unclear what is driving litigation,” wrote US District Court for the Northern District of California District Judge Charles Breyer in the order’s opening. “Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that its purpose is clear.”

“This case represents the latter circumstance,” Breyer said. “This case is about punishing defendants for speech.”


Comment Template

You May Also Like

Business

In the wake of Walmart’s departure as a major stakeholder and a stagnating Chinese e-commerce market, JD.com must persuade investors of its importance. This...

Technology

Anthropic stated on Thursday that the advantages of California’s updated measure, which aims to control the development and deployment of artificial intelligence within the...

Economy

Friday saw dollar weakness as investors braced for Jackson Hole address by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, while the yen topped other currencies in...

Politics

  Joe Biden had other plans for his address. Under the current conditions, at least not this year. Tragedies and hardships have left their...

Notice: The Biznob uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience and analyze our traffic. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy.

Ok